The Rosebank oil field is not compatible with a safe climate or liveable future. Together we can stop this project.
Last September, the previous UK government approved the development of the controversial Rosebank oil field. Rosebank is not compatible with a safe climate or liveable future.
We believe that this decision is not just a disaster for climate, and morally and economically wrong, but unlawful. Claims that drilling Rosebank is compatible with the UK’s obligations and a safe climate don't add up - and we will prove it in court.
Thanks to a historic decision taken by the Supreme Court in the recent Finch case, oil and gas companies will now have to disclose the full extent of the emissions created by new fossil fuel projects, like Rosebank. If, in the case against Rosebank, the judge agrees that the emissions from burning its oil should have been taken into account, the decision will have to be remade.
The new UK government has already admitted that the decision to approve Rosebank was unlawful. This is now a straight fight between a liveable future and oil and gas industry profits - and we’re more confident than ever that we’ll win.
There are not just one, but two cases to #StopRosebank, one by Uplift, the other by Greenpeace UK. Both will be heard in the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
The cases will argue that:
The case is being supported by over 20,000 individuals and groups such as 350.org, Extinction Rebellion, Oceana and WWF.
Uplift and Greenpeace have both filed judicial review challenges to the government’s decision to approve Rosebank. The cases argue that the decisions of the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero and the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) are unlawful because: